DC Universe     [all categories]
  DC Universe Archives
  Green Arrow Archives : A Discussion. (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Green Arrow Archives : A Discussion.
James Friel
Member
posted April 03, 2003 01:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Not only was GA a cover feature for several years in the '40s, as Owen's links show, but he's been starring in his own solo title (with a couple years off while he was dead) for 15 years now. I think that qualifies him. He's not in the same league as Superman and Batman, but I'm not sure any currently-active DC characters except possibly Wonder Woman could be said to outrank him.

IP: Logged

Jim Davis
Member
posted April 03, 2003 08:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Davis        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by James Friel:
Not only was GA a cover feature for several years in the '40s, as Owen's links show, but he's been starring in his own solo title (with a couple years off while he was dead) for 15 years now.

Sure, but I was disputing Blue Tracer's judgment:

"i would place Green Arrow as the joint top priority Silver Age character that has not yet been archived"

Green Arrow was not a cover feature during the Silver Age.

Jim Davis

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 03, 2003 11:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
You're right; I should have read your post more attentively. By the middle and late Silver Ages, in fact, he was about as obscure as he's ever been.

IP: Logged

BlueTracer
Member
posted April 03, 2003 12:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueTracer   Click Here to Email BlueTracer        Reply w/Quote

What i meant was that as far as i am concerned, Green Arrow is percieved as a Silver Age character and if you take away all the Silver Age characters that have been archived, Green Arrow along with Adam Strange are heading the list to get an archive kicked off.

The fact that Green Arrow should start with Golden Age stories does nothing to alter the fact that he is Silver Age by perception.

Aquaman too is a character that is Silver Age despite having GA beginnings.

The difference between the two is that there is no clear line of dilineation between Green Arrow's GA stories and the SA. On top of that, if GA were given a Silver Age archive it would be an extremely short run as the page counts were relatively low and only ran until 1964.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 03, 2003 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Hell, there's not much of a line for Aquaman--the one they picked isn't entirely arbitrary, but it's damn close.

IP: Logged

CMCINTYRE3600
Member
posted April 03, 2003 01:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CMCINTYRE3600   Click Here to Email CMCINTYRE3600        Reply w/Quote
My question is, by who's perception is he a Silver Age character? Esepcially if he only ran untill '64? That seems to me like saying that Superman is percieved as a Silver Age character because that is probably his most recognizeable era. Yet they both trancend that era like almost no other characters.
Chris

IP: Logged

BlueTracer
Member
posted April 03, 2003 01:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueTracer   Click Here to Email BlueTracer        Reply w/Quote

ok, this goes back to the JSA/JLA split.

In the past i've posted about my GA/SA priority split.

To briefly reiterate - i believe and the facts bear me out so far, that when it comes to archiving Golden Age DC characters (All American/National and not including Quality or Fawcett), archival priority goes to the JSA characters. At some point which we've not yet experienced, when Sandman, Dr Fate etc have been done, we may see a character such as Guardian or Shining Knight archived before the original Atom.

At that point a decision would have been made on aesthetic/art/creator concerns. However in the interim, i expect to see Hawkman, Sandman and Dr Fate as the next GA archives kicking off - all JSA characters.

In the Silver Age we have seen similar rules apply to the JLA. HOWEVER, this hasn't been quite so stringent as with the JSA/GA characters and other non JLA related characters have been archived or will be, such as Doom Patrol and Teen Titans.

On the whole however, the JLA priority applys and i include Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman in this as examples of continuous publication. Characters in current continuity percieved as Silver Age but with their origins in the Golden Age. Then came SA GL, FLASH, HAWKMAN, ATOM.

The only point of departure from this JLA continous publication character archiving has so far been Aquaman. It was the belief of many posters - myself i am indifferent for reasons i'll soon explain - that like Superman, Batman and WW, AQUAMAN should have started from the beginning.

However several factors apply that made TDCPTB start a SA archive - one of which is a relatively clear line of seperation based along perhaps the old EARTH ONE AND TWO SPLIT. Another is the fact that Aquaman's Silver Age material is much more weighty than Green Arrows.

My belief is that Green Arrow should be started like the big three were from the beginning and that along the line a decision to make a Silver Age archive could be made.

As of this posting, Green Arrow and Martian Manhunter are the only classic JLAers not to be archived.

IP: Logged

NecessaryImpurity
Member
posted April 03, 2003 02:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NecessaryImpurity        Reply w/Quote
Regarding the difference between Aquaman and Green Arrow, I think it can best be described as one was on the rise, the other on the decline.

Greean Arrow was born as a heavy hitter, getting dozens of covers on More Fun, a spot in the Seven Soldiers, and a secondary strip in World's Finest. In the first 2 years (Nov '41 to Oct '43), GA had 302 pages in 26 stories, with 15 covers.

Aquaman in the same period had 206 pages in 22 stories with no covers. Stictly filler.

Fast forward 20 years. In the period from Nov 1961 to Oct 1963, Green Arrow had joined the Justice League, and had been reduced to a mere 6 pages in World's Finest. That strip would end a few months later, leaving GA in the JLA only. Speedy, like Green Arrow had been in the JLA, would be ignored when the Teen Titans are formed.

Aquaman, meanwhile, had also joined the Justice League (as a founder), was in his own magazine, and had a secondary strip, first in Detective, then in World's Finest. The secondary strip would end in a few months. Aquaman would continue to appear in the JLA, and Aqualad would become a founding member of the Teen Titans.

Clearly, Green Arrow's best days are closer to the early days, while Aquaman's come much, much later. Also, by the time of the Atlantean origin in Adventure #260, Aquaman had begun to change into a very different character from the one seen in 1941. With the addition of the Atlantean elements, Aquaman (or more importantly, the writers) was hypercharged. Success was just around the corner. Green Arrow, meanwhile, was still "Batman with gimmicky arrows". A perception made worse by Batman's declining status in the same period.

You can make a strong case for dividing Aquaman's adventures somewhere in the neighborhood of Adventure #260; the character was clearly evolving into something different at the time. I don't think a good argument can be made for dividing Green Arrow's adventures anytime before the Adams makeover. There is no evolution in the firat 25 years.

IP: Logged

CMCINTYRE3600
Member
posted April 03, 2003 02:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CMCINTYRE3600   Click Here to Email CMCINTYRE3600        Reply w/Quote
I guess, depending on how you look at it, you can say that GA and J'onn J'onnz aren't the only classic JLAers not to have Archives. You could also include Superman and Wonder Woman, depending on your point of view. Those who concider Green Arrow or Aquaman to be primarily silver agers might also concider the SA Wonder Woman and Superman to be different characters from their GA personas, and hence to be Archiveless. Notice that the Batman of the JLA already has an Archive of his own.
Chris

IP: Logged

NecessaryImpurity
Member
posted April 03, 2003 02:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NecessaryImpurity        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CMCINTYRE3600:
I guess, depending on how you look at it, you can say that GA and J'onn J'onnz aren't the only classic JLAers not to have Archives. You could also include Superman and Wonder Woman, depending on your point of view. Those who concider Green Arrow or Aquaman to be primarily silver agers might also concider the SA Wonder Woman and Superman to be different characters from their GA personas, and hence to be Archiveless. Notice that the Batman of the JLA already has an Archive of his own.
Chris

I think you can make that distinction too. SA Superman and SA Wonder Woman are very different features from the ones that have already been Archived. Fortunately, a SA Superman will happen within a year or two. SA Wonder Woman's another matter.

IP: Logged

NecessaryImpurity
Member
posted April 03, 2003 02:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NecessaryImpurity        Reply w/Quote
One other thing: In the year or so prior to the announcement of the Aquaman Archive, there were some pretty spirited discussions about Aquaman on this board. Cause and effect? You be the judge!

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 03, 2003 03:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Tracer, I think maybe you're reading a greater degree of organization into DC's decision making than actually exists.
I agree that Hawkman, Sandman, and Dr.Fate will be among the next four or five solo Golden Age character archives done, but I think the JSA connection exists only insofar as it makes them higher-profile characters today. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Green Arrow inserted into that list at anywhere from the second to the fourth position (I think Hawkman still will be first).
I don't think there's anything like a "rule" for choosing either GA or SA archival candidates, except "Will it sell?"

IP: Logged

BlueTracer
Member
posted April 03, 2003 04:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueTracer   Click Here to Email BlueTracer        Reply w/Quote

James - you're absolutely right. i don't think there is a hard and fast rule, but there is a correlation along the lines of era popularity which in the GA means apart from the big 3, it was pretty obvious that Flash and GL would be next and other JSAers to follow - simply put they weren't in the JSA for no reason.

However the two features from the main anthologys rule meant that some characters made it into the JSA because of title placement. I.E Atom made it into the JSA because he was from All American and he made it in over possibly more popular at the time features who ranked 3rd in their anthology.

What this meant was instead of possible obscurity for Atom - a feature with not the greatest art and stories, he was instantly guaranteed his future place in comics history over the likes of Sargon or Guardian and once the JSA were revived, Atom's early revival coincided. Another byproduct was that DC chose to update the Atom in the Silver Age in a version that became more popular comparitively than the original.


For the JLA characters, they were quite simply the most popular solo characters at the time so they ended up being JLA members.

popularity went hand in hand with early JLA membership in the majority of cases and it is the most popular Silver Age features that logically would be archived first so therefore although there is no hard n fast rule, it is mainly JLAers that got priority - Doom Patrol as a team is different of course.

IP: Logged

BlueTracer
Member
posted April 03, 2003 05:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueTracer   Click Here to Email BlueTracer        Reply w/Quote

CMCINTYRE3600 - you do have a point, but for the purposes of my discussion i'm refering to characters with NO representation in any era. Superman and Wonder Woman are JLA members with archives no matter what period the stories start. Green Arrow is not archived in any form.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 03, 2003 08:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BlueTracer:

However the two features from the main anthologys rule meant that some characters made it into the JSA because of title placement. I.E Atom made it into the JSA because he was from All American and he made it in over possibly more popular at the time features who ranked 3rd in their anthology.

What this meant was instead of possible obscurity for Atom - a feature with not the greatest art and stories, he was instantly guaranteed his future place in comics history over the likes of Sargon or Guardian and once the JSA were revived, Atom's early revival coincided. Another byproduct was that DC chose to update the Atom in the Silver Age in a version that became more popular comparitively than the original.


I see what you were getting at.
Yes, the original rule for the JSA was two characters each from Adventure (DC), More Fun (DC), Flash (AA) and All-American (AA). After the DC/AA split, that obviously went out the window in favor of all-AA membership and never really came back once they were reunited; otherwise we might have seen characters like Air Wave, Liberty Belle, or Robotman in the JSA and they might in turn have had Silver Age revivals.

IP: Logged

profh0011
Member
posted April 03, 2003 11:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for profh0011   Click Here to Email profh0011        Reply w/Quote
"Other than origin details, there really isn't much difference between 1941 Green Arrow and 1961 Green Arrow. Unlike Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, and Aquaman, who all had major shifts in tone, backstory, and the elements and trappings that went into making a standard story for those characters. More than any other character in the DCU, Green Arrow was a constant until the revamp for GL/GA. His stories should be treated as one series."

I've read in the past that the "Silver Age" GA is thought of as beginning with the Jack Kirby issues. Thanks to Jack Schiff, Kirby was booted from DC and GA returned to his previous 3rd-rate status. Otherwise, there COULD have been a real distinction between the 50's & 60's eras, instead of breaking neatly into 2 periods (before and after Adams).

"I also really like the Arrowplane concept (at that point the car was the Arrowplane -- they weren't separate vehicles)."

Oh wow-- really? THE SPIRIT also had a car that flew via fold-out wings. (Who asked Ollie "Did you ever have an original idea?" heehee)

So GA's series stopped altogether in 1964? Too bad-- otherwise, HE might have turned up on the SUPER-FRIENDS cartoon along with the "big 4".

IP: Logged

chris_ccl
Member
posted April 03, 2003 11:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chris_ccl   Click Here to Email chris_ccl        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by profh0011:
So GA's series stopped altogether in 1964? Too bad-- otherwise, HE might have turned up on the SUPER-FRIENDS cartoon along with the "big 4".

Ahhh...Green Arrow DID appear on "Superfriends" (the Wendy and Marvin era). He only appeared once. According to Scott McCullars site the design for the (GA)outfit was by Alex Toth for the Hanna Barbera artists. It is actually the Neal Adams design, but has a uniqueness to it.I tried to find pic, but the site was down. I'll check back, though.
Chris

------------------
Collected Comics Library
T.H.U.N.D.E.R. Agents

IP: Logged

Lee Semmens
Member
posted April 04, 2003 06:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lee Semmens        Reply w/Quote
I've always tended to view Green Arrow (pre-1969) as essentially a Golden Age, not Silver Age, character, even though his original run ended in 1964.
This view is formed more by the art and plots rather than a simple time period methodology. By the way, I have also always thought of the Batman stories from the second half of the 1950s through to 1964 as resembling more Golden Age than SA stories, artwise and storywise, but that is another matter.
I've always thought the pre-1969 Green Arrow as being the odd man out in the JLA for this reason, and the fact that between 1964 and 1969 we only ever saw him as a JLA member, save for a few Brave & Bold appearances, and the occasional guest appearance in another character's feature, ie. Superman, Supergirl.
A possibly complicating factor is that Green Arrow was a member of the Seven Soldiers of Victory long before the JLA, nevertheless, any division of the character into different eras in the 1950s is extremely arbritary in my opinion (some people go on things like when his hat changes color, or something like that!). The change of artist from George Papp to Jack Kirby (in 1958), then Lee Elias is not sufficient reason to determine the change of "Age". The art might have changed but the writers were still the same, as were the plots, and the feel of the stories were pretty much the same, which is apparently at least part of the reason Kirby had his falling-out with editor Jack Schiff and left or was sacked from the strip.
I firmly believe that Green Arrow archives should start in 1941, otherwise in the 1970s (when he appeared as backup in Action Comics), but I wouldn't want to see the latter archived for quite a while.
My suspicion is that most of those in favor of a late 1950s start for Green Arrow archives are anxious to get the Kirby stuff, which is readily available anyway, and to a lesser extent, that by Elias.
In my view, if the post-Papp stuff is archived first we will NEVER get the earlier material, which may well be the case with Aquaman too.

IP: Logged

profh0011
Member
posted April 04, 2003 03:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for profh0011   Click Here to Email profh0011        Reply w/Quote
"He only appeared once."

That was my point.

Some years back, I read that Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman & Green Arrow were the ONLY 5 superheroes who were published continually from the Golden Age to the Silver Age. I was surprised to hear about Aquaman & Green Arrow, but then they'd both been back-up features (in DC books; ALL the AA superheos had been canned!!). This "explained" why Aquaman, a comparitively "obscure" character (next to the "big 3") got his own cartoon show in 1967, and why he was one of the 4 main heroes when THE SUPER FRIENDS debuted several years later.

The show was so insufferably bad on every single level when it started, so completely unwatchable, that I think I stopped after the first 2 weeks. So if GA made an appearance, I sure never saw him! (I never watched the show again until it became SUPER POWERS: GALACTIC GUARDIANS; the level of improvement is reflected in the fact that THOSE episodes I taped, as I also did the season that preceded it, which they included as reruns that season.)

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 04, 2003 05:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Several other DC superheroes (Vigilante, Johnny Quick, Shining Knight, Robotman, and almost Zatara) made it out of the 1940s alive, but succumbed before the hero revival of the middle-late '50s started, otherwise they all might be major DC players today. I've long thought that Robotman in particular probably could have been saved by a colorful paint job. Look what it did for Tony Stark.

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted April 05, 2003 01:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
My introduction to Green Arrow came in about 1957. By then he was using boxing-glove arrows, mummy arrows, 3-stage-rocket arrows, etc.

Does anyone know if he started out with trick arrows, or did they evolve over the years? Unless he was allowed to be a bit more gorey in the pre-Code days, I'd think the archer would be pretty dull every month pinning crooks to the wall with arrows, or shooting out their get-away car's tires.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 06, 2003 01:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
That's the limiting factor of "gimmick" heroes: they're so specialized that unless some way can be found for them either to transcend their specialized nature (as Green Arrow finally did when Adams changed his personality and he became not so much an archer as an activist) or to expand it (as was done to Aquaman when the Atlantis background was added, more fully fleshing out his world), they're doomed to repeat the same shtick over and over and over.
I think Green Arrow and other long but relatively uneventful series (Blackhawk, Vigilante) are excellent arguments for skipping around and publishing volumes out of sequence, to at least give us solid chunks of several periods of the characters' careers before the series dribbles to a stop, which I think might well happen if they try to do it strictly consecutively.
Marty, that's your cue...

IP: Logged

Marty Raap
Member
posted April 06, 2003 11:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marty Raap        Reply w/Quote
James, you've convinced me. I finally see the light. Let's start with Green Arrow Archive #20, then get GA Archive #7, and then GA Archive #13 . . . .

Nah, just kidding! Start at the beginning and go forward from there, straight and true as a green arrow in flight! It's all about ARCHIVING these series, baby!

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted April 06, 2003 04:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Oh, I'm in favor of starting at the beginning, and continuing chronologically--but if things start to bog down, I'd consider skipping forward (with every intention of filling in the gap when things improve) rather than slowing down or stopping, which are the other options.

IP: Logged

NecessaryImpurity
Member
posted April 06, 2003 05:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NecessaryImpurity        Reply w/Quote
Skipping forward to what? In GA's first 25 years, is there anyting that can be said to be the highlight? It's all very much the same to my mind. Which is why, alyough I really want this material, a tri-annual release schedule would be just about right. Slow enough for people to build up some demand for the material, but often enough to assure them that it's coming.

I know, tri-annual sounds awfully slow, but we now have 33 different lines (counting the Challs, Titans, Superboy, and the unnamed GA #1 later this year). Even with an expanded schedule, tri-annual will be a norm for many lines.

IP: Logged


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | DC Comics

Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47